THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte LANNY D. VENHAM,
SHARON D. HICKS and DOUGLAS A. WICKS
______________
Appeal No. 1997-1790
Application 08/171,5501
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before CAROFF, DOWNEY and WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on Appeal
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision of the examiner finally rejecting
claims 13 through 15. Claims 1 through 12 are also of record and have been allowed by the examiner.
Claim 13 is illustrative of the claims on appeal:
13. An aldimine based on the reaction product of diamino dicyclohexyl methane with an
aldehyde corresponding to the formula:
O=CHCH(R )(R )
1 2
1Application for patent filed December 21, 1993.
- 1 -
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007