THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte CHRISTER HANNERSTIG
_____________
Appeal No. 1997-1970
Application 08/268,7321
______________
ON BRIEF2
_______________
Before COHEN, NASE and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection (Paper No. 10)
of claims 21 through 30. Subsequent to appeal, claim 30 was
1 Application for patent filed June 30, 1994. According to the appellant, the
application is a continuation of Application 07/910,012, filed September 8, 1992, now
Patent No. 5,343,925, issued September 6, 1994.
2 The decision in this case was made on brief since, notwithstanding the
circumstance that hearing attendance was confirmed (Paper No. 28), counsel for appellant
did not appear at the scheduled oral hearing.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007