Ex parte SAMOIL et al. - Page 9




          Appeal No. 1997-2027                                                        
          Application 08/417,419                                                      


          particular, the examiner should consider whether claim 16 and               
          any other of the pending claims in the present application                  
          patentably distinguish over Best.                                           
                                       Summary                                        
               The final rejection of claims 16-32 as being unpatentable              
          over AAPA in view of Fleischer is reversed.                                 


















               This application is remanded to the examiner for                       
          consideration of the patentability of the appealed claims in                
          light of the Best reference, of record.                                     
               The decision of the examiner is reversed.                              


                                          9                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007