THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 38
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte SHINSUKE YURA and SHINJI HORIBATA
____________
Appeal No. 97-2457
Application No. 08/366,3761
____________
HEARD: May 5, 1999
____________
Before BARRETT, DIXON, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.
BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from a patent examiner's
final rejection of claims 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 13, 14, 16-18,
and 20-22. Claim 3 was canceled. Claims 5, 7, 9, 11, 12, 15,
19, and 23 were allowed.
We reverse.
Application for patent filed December 29, 1994, which is a continuation of1
Application 08/006,756, filed January 21, 1993, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007