THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte CHARLES R. SLATER,
MATTHEW A. PALMER, and PETER KRATSCH
__________
Appeal No. 97-2486
Application 08/308,9831
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before McCandlish, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, MEISTER
and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
1Application for patent filed September 19, 1994.
According to appellants, this application is a continuation of
Application 08/107,454, filed August 17, 1993, now U.S. Patent
No. 5,396,900; which is a continuation-in-part of Application
07/922,023, filed July 28, 1992, now U.S. Patent No.
5,331,971; which is a continuation of Application 07/680,392,
filed April 4, 1991, now U.S. Patent No. 5,192,298; and a
continuation-in-part of Application 07/978,249, filed November
18, 1992, now U.S. Patent No. 5,395,375; and a continuation-
in-part of Application 08/016,595, filed February 11, 1993,
now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007