THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte RANDALL R. HEISCH
_____________
Appeal No. 97-2525
Application 08/291,3701
_____________
ON BRIEF
_____________
Before KRASS, LEE and TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the examiner's final rejection of claims 20, 23-25, 28-30, and
33-34. No claim has been allowed.
References relied on by the Examiner
Pettis et al. (Pettis) 5,212,794 May 18,
1993
Levine et al. (Levine) 5,446,876 Aug. 29,
1995
Application for patent filed August 15, 1994.1
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007