THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte SYOJI MITSUHASHI,
and SATORU GOZU
_____________
Appeal No. 97-2582
Application 08/484,3531
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before KRASS, FLEMING and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the examiner's rejection of claims 7, 8-10 and 15-18. No
claim has been allowed.
References relied on by the Examiner
Kinoshita et al. 5,170,262 Dec. 8, 1992
(Kinoshita)
Application for patent filed June 7, 1995. According to appellants, the1
application is a division of Application 08/144,809, filed October 28, 1993, now Patent
No. 5,497,193, granted March 5, 1996.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007