Appeal No. 97-2626
Application 08/234,502
there is no error.).
Accordingly, we will reverse the decision of the examiner
rejecting claims 49, 51, 57, 59, 61, and 62 as being
unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Narita ‘93, and over
Narita ‘93 in view of Narita ‘92.
As applied by the examiner, Hasegawa does not make up for
the deficiencies of Narita ‘93 and Narita ‘92. Accordingly,
we will also reverse the decision of the examiner rejecting
claims 50, 52, 58, 60, and 63-65 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over
Narita ‘93 in view of Hasegawa, and over Narita ‘93 in view of
Narita ‘92 and Hasegawa.
C. Decision
The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 49-52 and
57-65 under the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112 is
reversed.
The examiner’s rejection of claims 49, 51, 57, 59, 61,
and 62 as being unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Narita
‘93 is reversed.
The examiner’s rejection of claims 50, 52, 58, 60, and
63-65 as being unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Narita
‘93 in view of Hasegawa is reversed.
The examiner’s rejection of claims 49, 51, 57, 59, 61,
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007