Ex parte POSTON - Page 1




                               THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                       

                      The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                                        
                      today (1) was not written for publication in a law                                                          
                      journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the                                                             
                      Board.                                                                                                      
                                                                                                Paper No. 19                      
                                 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                        
                                                       ____________                                                               
                                       BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                         
                                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                                             
                                                       ____________                                                               
                                             Ex parte TRAVIS B. POSTON                                                            
                                                       ____________                                                               
                                                   Appeal No. 97-2881                                                             
                                            Application No. 08/387,1661                                                           
                                                       ____________                                                               
                                                          ON BRIEF                                                                
                                                       ____________                                                               
               Before HAIRSTON, KRASS, and FRAHM, Administrative Patent                                                           
               Judges.                                                                                                            
               HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                             




                                                   DECISION ON APPEAL                                                             
                      This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1                                                      
               through 12.                                                                                                        
                      The disclosed invention relates to an electrical shield                                                     
               for securing an exterior telephone service line and                                                                

                      1Application for patent filed February 13, 1995.                                                            





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007