Ex parte GIORGIO et al. - Page 8




          Appeal No. 97-2982                                         Page 8           
          Application No. 08/219,554                                                  


          standard,” they submit, ”the ATTENTION DATA would be cleared                
          for all host processors.”  (Id.)                                            


               Regarding independent claim 1, we find that Fischer and                
          ANSI fail to teach or to have suggested the clearing of                     
          ATTENTION DATA as claimed.  The claim recites in pertinent                  
          part “clearing ... only the ATTENTION DATA for said one of                  
          said plurality of host processors from said one of said                     
          plurality of SCSI targets ....”  (Id. at 9.)  The appellants                
          assert, “[t]he word only is critical.”  (Id. at 6.)  They                   
          explain that the claim was amended specifically to recite this              
          feature to differentiate the claim from the prior art.  (Id.)               
          Comparison of the claim language to Fischer and ANSI evidences              
          that the references neither teach nor would have suggested the              
          claimed clearing of ATTENTION DATA.                                         


               Fischer discloses interfacing a plurality of processors                
          20 to a plurality of I/O devices 42a-42c via an I/O adapter                 
          22a and a main memory 26.  Data transferred between the                     
          processors and  devices are written to a memory in the                      
          reference’s controller.  Col. 4, ll. 14-20.  The memory                     







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007