Ex parte ALLEN et al. - Page 5




          Appeal No. 97-3173                                                          
          Application No. 08/462,310                                                  


          of the sole portion (main brief, pages 6 and 7).   The4                           
          examiner, on the other hand, asserts that Figure 10 of Austin               
          shows at least two spike sockets in the shank section (answer,              
          page 5).  Our review of Austin, however, fails to reveal any                
          teaching or suggestion that the members 40 which are most                   
          distant from the toe section in Figure 10 of Austin are                     
          located or should be located in the shank section of the sole.              
          Austin neither describes the sole as including spike sockets                
          in the shank section nor illustrates the "linkage" of Figure                
          10 incorporated into a shoe sole.  Accordingly, we agree with               
          appellants that Figure 10 of Austin would not have suggested                
          locating spike sockets in the shank section, of the sole                    
          portion.  Our review of Bernier and Strickland reveal that                  
          they suffer from the same deficiency.                                       









               The shank section is defined at page 10 of the specification as the4                                                                     
          section of the sole that underlies the arch of the foot and is illustrated as
          the section between lines CC and DD in Figure 2 of appellants' drawings.    
                                          5                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007