THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________________
Ex parte JOHANNES H. WESSELS
__________________
Appeal No. 97-3672
Application 08/515,3121
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before THOMAS, FLEMING, and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-14. Claims 15-18
have been objected to by the examiner as being dependent upon
a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in
independent form. No claim has been allowed.
References relied on by the Examiner
1. Shackle Patent 5,412,287 May 2,
1995
1
Application for patent filed August 15, 1995.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007