THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 30
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOHN A. BRIDGES
____________
Appeal No. 97-4166
Application No. 08/478,6471
____________
ON REHEARING
____________
Before CALVERT, MEISTER and GARRIS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
MEISTER, Administrative Patent Judge.
ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING
The appellant requests we reconsider our decision mailed
on September 16, 1998 wherein we (I) affirmed the rejection of
claims 86, 88, 89, 95, 97 and 99 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as
1Application for patent filed June 7, 1995. According to
appellant, this application is a continuation of Application
No. 07/980,113 filed November 23, 1992, now U.S. Patent No.
5,465,891 issued November 14, 1995; which is a continuation of
Application No. 07/704,024 filed May 22, 1991, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007