Ex parte ROLAND - Page 1





                   THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                       
               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
               today (1) was not written for publication in a law                     
               journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the                        
               Board.                                                                 
                                                                Paper No. 17          
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                                                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                                                                     
                             Ex parte RUSSELL A. ROLAND                               
                                                                                     
                                  Appeal No. 97-4249                                  
                             Application No. 08/249,4001                              
                                                                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                                                                     
          Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, ABRAMS               
          and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                     
          ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        





                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner                    
          finally                                                                     
          rejecting claims 1-9 and 11-20, which constitute all of the                 

               Application for patent filed May 26, 1994.1                                                                     




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007