THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte RICHARD G. RINCOE and PAUL J. MOORE, JR.
____________
Appeal No. 97-4293
Application No. 08/138,3961
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before ABRAMS, FRANKFORT and STAAB, Administrative Patent
Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner
finally rejecting claims 1, 3-5, 9-11, 14-16, 18, 22-29, 41
1Application for patent filed October 18, 1993.
According to appellants, this application is a division of
Application 07/704,615 filed May 23, 1991, now U.S. Patent No.
5,253,656 issued October 19, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007