THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 46
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte TAKEO YOSHIDA, YOSHIKAZU NAKAMURA,
MINORU SUZUKI and RYOICHI HIRAI
____________
Appeal No. 1997-4373
Application No. 08/332,6561
____________
HEARD: October 4, 1999
____________
Before PATE, McQUADE and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 6, 23 and 25 through 27. Claims
7 through 22, 24 and 28 have been indicated as allowable by
the examiner (answer, Paper No. 38, page 2).
1Application for patent filed November 1, 1994. According to the
appellants, the application is a continuation of Application No. 07/753,708,
filed September 3, 1991, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007