Appeal No. 1998-0454 Page 6
Application No. 08/417,985
of the other operating member is canceled by activation of the
TFDCO member” involves an unacceptable broadening of the
claimed invention [answer-page 5].
Our review of the amended claim finds no such broadening
of the claim scope. Any encompassing of “plural operational
states,” as the examiner calls it, is only a consequence of the
now amended claim language to point out that it is the
transmission member which moves the trigger member and the
trigger member operates the tape feeding direction change-over
mechanism and that the cancellation of the arresting condition
depends on whether one of the first and second operating
members is advanced while the other operating member is
arrested or the reel receiving elements stop with the other
operating member being arrested. We do not find that the
further specification of the conditions under which certain
actions take place constitutes a broadening of the claim scope.
Similarly, with new claim 4, while the examiner indicates
that the claim scope is broader than that of claim 1 in the
original patent, because the claim now recites that the
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007