Ex parte FONTANA - Page 3




                     Appeal No. 98-1017                                                                                                                                                
                     Application 08/585,472                                                                                                                                            


                     (French Patent Document)2                                                                                                                                         




                                Claims 1 through 7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Andre in                                                            

                     view of Dozorsky.                                                                                                                                                 

                                Reference is made to the appellant’s brief (Paper No. 7) and to the examiner’s answer (Paper                                                           

                     No. 8) for the respective positions of the appellant and the examiner with regard to the merits of this                                                           

                     rejection.                                                                                                                                                        

                                Andre, the examiner’s primary reference, pertains to board games having military themes.  The                                                          

                     embodiment relied upon by the examiner (see Figures 21 through 31 and pages 19 through 26 of the                                                                  

                     translation) includes a checkerboard playing area having squares designating ground, fortified positions                                                          

                     and a river and a variety of playing pieces whose capacity to move, capture and destroy is dictated by                                                            

                     their relationship with the board and the other playing pieces.                                                                                                   

                                As conceded by the examiner (see page 4 in the answer), Andre fails to meet the limitations in                                                         

                     claim 1 requiring the step of placing a plurality of playing pieces initially in predetermined ones of                                                            

                     squares of a playing board for a first and a second player with the position of the pieces for the first and                                                      

                     second players being initially a mirror image.  In this regard, Andre teaches that “[a]t the beginning of                                                         


                                2The record indicates that an English language translation of this reference was mailed to the                                                         
                     appellant with the examiner’s answer.                                                                                                                             
                                                                                          3                                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007