Ex parte GUBERNICK - Page 4




          Appeal No. 98-1047                                                          
          Application 08/612,814                                                      


               when in an undeformed state [column 1, line 56,                        
               through column 2, line 3].                                             
               As conceded by the examiner (see page 4 in the answer),                
          Scatterday does not teach, and would not have suggested, a                  
          device meeting the limitations in independent claims 1 and 8                
          relating to                                                                 




          the tabular register of calendar indicia on the exterior                    
          surface of the deformable member covering.  In this regard,                 
          the Scatterday device is not disclosed as having any sort of                
          indicia.                                                                    
               Thomas discloses a novelty device for use as a calendar,               
          a paper weight and/or a desk ornament.  The device consists of              
          a circular frame 10 mounted on a standard 11 rising from a                  
          base 12, and a spherical member 13 which "is provided upon its              
          outer surface with suitable indicia representing the months                 
          and the days of the month so as to provide a calendar" (page                
          1, lines 49 through 52).  The spherical member is rotatable                 
          within the frame so that the indicia representing each month                
          may be moved into a display position (see Figure 1).                        

                                         -4-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007