THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte DANIEL J. BALBIERZ, JACK M. WALKER,
JOSEPH R. THOMAS, ROBERT S. BLEY and KEVIN VAN BLADEL
________________
Appeal No. 98-1936
Application 08/316,9331
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before MEISTER, ABRAMS and FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent
Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
1Application for patent filed October 3, 1994.
According to appellants, the application is a continuation-in-
part of Application 08/000,274, filed January 4, 1993, now
U.S. Patent No. 5,599,291, issued February 4, 1997.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007