THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte PHILIP C. DUROCHER
____________
Appeal No. 98-2120
Application No. 08/607,9151
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before MEISTER, ABRAMS and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
MEISTER, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Philip C. Durocher (the appellant) appeals from the final
rejection of claims 5-11, the only claims remaining in the
application.2
1Application for patent filed February 28, 1996.
2Claim 9 has been amended subsequent to final rejection
by an amendment filed July 14, 1997 (Paper No. 7), which
amendment was deemed by the examiner to overcome the final
(continued...)
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007