Appeal No. 98-2187
Application 08/051,033
Claim 68 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Lin and Bille as applied to claim 62 above,
and further in view of Menger.
Claims 78, 81 through 83 and 94 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Lin and Bille as
applied above, and further in view of L’Esperance.
Claims 96 through 98 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over Lin and Bille as applied above, and
further in view of Baron.
Claim 69 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Lin and Bille as applied above, and further
in view of Menger.2
2 Given that claim 69 depends from claim 98, we understand this rejection to be
more correctly based on Lin, Bille and Baron as applied to claim 98, further in view of
Menger.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007