Ex parte BERG - Page 2




                Appeal No. 98-2520                                                                                                         
                Application 08/613,792                                                                                                     



                                This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's                                                           
                final rejection of claims 1 through 4, 6 through 27 and 29.                                     2                          
                Claim 5                                                                                                                    
                has been canceled.  Claim 28 stands objected to, but has been                                                              
                indicated by the examiner to be allowable if rewritten in                                                                  
                independent form.                                                                                                          


                                Appellant's invention is directed to a lightweight                                                         
                shaft of composite construction, a golf club which utilizes                                                                
                said lightweight shaft, and a method of making said light-                                                                 
                weight shaft.  Claims 1, 17, 23, 24, 25 and 29 are representa-                                                             
                tive of the subject matter on appeal and copies of those                                                                   
                claims appear in the Appendix to appellant's brief.                                                                        


                                The prior art references relied upon by the examiner                                                       
                in rejecting the appealed claims are:                                                                                      
                Roy                              4,889,575       Dec. 26, 1989                                                             
                Noguchi                          5,385,767       Jan. 31, 1995                                                             
                Kusumoto                         5,427,373       June 27, 1995                                                             
                Akatsuka et al. (Akatsuka)       5,437,450       Aug.  1, 1995                                                             

                        2Claim 29 was amended subsequent to the final rejection                                                            
                in a paper filed February 18, 1998 (Paper No. 10).                                                                         
                                                                    2                                                                      





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007