Ex parte SANDERS et al. - Page 2




                 Appeal No. 98-2691                                                                                                                     
                 Application No. 08/529,041                                                                                                             


                          This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 to                                                                     
                 23, 25, 27 and 28.  Claims 24 and 26, the other claims in the                                                                          
                 application, stand withdrawn from consideration under 37 CFR §                                                                         
                 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention.                                                                                     
                          The subject matter involved in this appeal concerns a                                                                         
                 system for directing fluid in a particular repetitive pattern                                                                          
                 onto a moving substrate, such as for high pressure water                                                                               
                 cutting of a web of absorbent material to make components of                                                                           
                 disposable diapers.  The appealed claims are directed to                                                                               
                 apparatus for directing a fluid (claims 1, 3 to 12, 27 and 28)                                                                         
                 and for cutting (claims 2), and a method for directing a fluid                                                                         
                 (claims 13, 15 to 23 and 25) and for cutting (claim 14).   The                                       2                                 
                 claims on appeal are reproduced in Appendix 1 of appellants’                                                                           
                 brief.3                                                                                                                                
                          The references applied in the final rejection are:                                                                            
                 Pearl                                        4,328,726                                             May  11,                            
                 1982                                                                                                                                   


                          2In reviewing the application, we note that the tubing                                                                        
                 coil recited in claims 8 and 17 is not shown in the drawings,                                                                          
                 as required by 37 CFR § 1.83(a).                                                                                                       
                          3All references herein to appellants’ brief are to the                                                                        
                 revised brief filed on February 2, 1998.                                                                                               
                                                                           2                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007