Appeal No. 98-2771
Application 08/428,863
Claim 4 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Morozov in view of Oaks as applied to claim
1 above, and further in view of Mansfield.
Claims 5 and 6 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Morozov in view of Oaks as applied to
claim 1 above, and further in view of Marcolin.
Claims 11 and 12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Morozov in view of Oaks as applied to
claim 10 above, and further in view of Puckett.
Claims 14 and 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Gvoich.
Claim 15 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Gvoich in view of Oaks.
Claim 16 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Gvoich in view of Oaks as applied to claim
15 above, and further in view of Wilson.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007