Ex parte SKEDELESKI - Page 1




                                        THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                   
               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for                                      
               publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                             
                                                                                                   Paper No. 35                        
                                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                            
                                                           __________                                                                  
                                        BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                             
                                                      AND INTERFERENCES                                                                
                                                           __________                                                                  
                                               Ex parte DAVID SKEDELESKI                                                               
                                                           __________                                                                  
                                                     Appeal No. 98-2946                                                                
                                                 Application 08/291,5961                                                               
                                                          ___________                                                                  
                                                             ON BRIEF                                                                  
                                                          ___________                                                                  

               Before CALVERT, MEISTER and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent                                                             
               Judges.                                                                                                                 
               CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                   

                                                     DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                
                       This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 9                                                       
               to 13, 15, 16 and 21.  Claims 3 to 6, 8 and 22 to 24, the                                                               
               other claims remaining in the application, have been allowed.                                                           
                       The claims on appeal are drawn to a snowboard with                                                              
               protective tip cover, and are reproduced in the appendix to                                                             
               appellant’s brief.                                                                                                      


                       1   Application for patent filed August 16, 1994.                                                               
                                                                  1                                                                    




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007