THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte MARK A. DIESCH
__________
Appeal No. 98-3287
Reissue Application 08/354,6241
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before NASE, CRAWFORD and GONZALES, Administrative Patent
Judges.
GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's
Application filed December 13, 1994, for reissue of U.S. Patent No.1
5,094,224, issued March 10, 1992, based on application 07/661,493, filed
February 26, 1991.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007