Ex parte MALONEY et al. - Page 4




          Appeal No. 98-3299                                                          
          Application 08/335,331                                                      


          reverse all the rejections of claims 1 through 4 and 6 through              
          93.                                                                         
               We treat the various rejections in the same order as they              
          appear in the Examiner’s answer and the Appellants’ brief.                  







              Rejections Under The Second Paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112                


               With respect to the § 112 second paragraph rejections, we              
          agree with Appellants on the issues of “collateral                          
          information”, “directly combining” and “undue multiplicity”.                
          We have reviewed the contentions of the Examiner as to these                
          points [answer, pages 3 to 4], and Appellants’ corresponding                
          rebuttal [brief, pages 12 to 16].  We have further studied the              
          portions of the specification referred to by Appellants’                    
          rebuttal.  We find that the terms “collateral information” and              
          “directly combining”, as they are used in the claims and                    
          explained in the specification and further elucidated by the                
          Newman Declaration [paper no. 16], are definite and clear.  As              
                                         -4-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007