Ex parte ARNOLD et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 98-3303                                                          
          Application 08/568,211                                                      



          7 through 11, 13 through 15, and 21 were finally rejected,                  
          claim 21 is the only rejected claim on appeal.  Claims 16                   
          through 20, the only other claims pending in the application,               
          stand withdrawn pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 1.142(b) as being                   
          based upon a nonelected species.                                            


               Appellants’ invention pertains to a manually-actuated                  
          spray pump for dispensing fluid.  An understanding of the                   
          invention can be derived from a reading of claim 21, a copy of              
          which appears in the APPENDIX to the brief (Paper No. 12).                  


               As evidence of obviousness, the examiner has applied the               
          documents listed below:                                                     

          Collins             1,814,504                     Jul. 14, 1931             
          Montaner et al.     5,025,958                     Jun. 25, 1991             
          (Montaner)                                                                  


               The following rejection is before us for review.                       


               Claim 21 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                
          unpatentable over Collins in view of Montaner.                              
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007