Ex parte GARDNER - Page 4




          Appeal No. 98-3306                                                          
          Application 08/866,014                                                      


          ball supporting posts (b) of Grave to be in the form of flat,               
          planar metal strips or panels as seen in Figure 5 of Holland,               
          we fail to see any teaching, suggestion or incentive in the                 
          applied references that would have further motivated such an                
          artisan to shape and arrange the planar strips or panels of                 
          the golf ball holder of Grave (as modified) so as to provide                
          alphabetic characters arranged to depict the alphabetic                     
          acronym initials of a particular institution, as required in                
          appellants’ claims on appeal.  The examiner’s position                      
          (answer, pages 4-5) that                                                    
               “It would have been obvious to one of ordinary                         
               skill in the art at the time the invention was made                    
               to have shaped and arranged the panels in such a                       
               manner in order to increase the aesthetic appearance                   
               of the rack.  Moreover, it would have been obvious                     
               as a matter of design choice to have shaped the                        
               planar panels in the shapes mentioned above (e.g.,                     
               two alphabetic characters), since the applicant has                    
               not disclosed that having this feature solves any                      
               stated problems or is for any particular purpose and                   
               it appears that the planar panels would perform                        
               equally well with shapes other than that claimed by                    
               the appellant”                                                         
          is, in our opinion, based on impermissible hindsight gained                 
          only from appellants’ disclosure.                                           





                                          4                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007