Court Opinions

State Laws

US Code

US Constitution

Ex parte PARISI et al. - Page 1

Legal Research Home > Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 1999 > Ex parte PARISI et al. - Page 1

                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)              
          was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is                 
          not binding precedent of the Board.                                         
                                                            Paper No. 22              

                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                        
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                     Ex parte BERNARD PARISI and DAVID J. BURKE                       
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 1998-3314                                  
                               Application 08/666,0931                                
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      

          Before FRANKFORT, STAAB and BAHR, Administrative Patent                     
          Judges.                                                                     
          STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         



                              On Request for Rehearing                                
               Appellants request rehearing of our decision of October                
          29, 1999, wherein we reversed the examiner’s final rejection                
          of claims 1-3, 8, 9, 11-13, 16, and 19, and affirmed the                    


               1Application for patent filed June 19, 1996.                           
                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007