Appeal No. 98-3327
Application No. 08/606,651
consideration as being drawn to a non-elected invention. No
claims have been allowed.
The appellant's invention is directed to an ophthalmic
probe. The claims on appeal have been reproduced in an
appendix to the Brief.
THE REFERENCE
Easley et al. (Easley) 5,441,496 Aug. 15,
1995
THE REJECTION
Claims 1, 4-6 and 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over Easley.
The rejection is explained in Paper No. 6 (the final
rejection).
The opposing viewpoints of the appellant have been
expressed in the Brief.
OPINION
As set forth in independent claim 1, the appellant’s
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007