THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 10
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte JOEL VATSKY
_____________
Appeal No. 99-0029
Application 08/595,9671
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before CALVERT, MEISTER and ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judges.
CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 29 to 32, all the claims remaining in this
application.2
1Application for patent filed February 6, 1996.
2We note that in his brief appellant requests an oral hearing, but under the circumstances a
hearing is not considered necessary. See 37 CFR § 1.194(c), last sentence, as amended effective
Dec. 1, 1997 (62 F.R. 53131 (Oct. 10, 1997), 1203 O.G. 63 (Oct. 21, 1997)), and MPEP § 1209
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007