Ex parte STEFFEN - Page 1




                                     THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                       
                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for                                                     
                 publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                            
                                                                                                      Paper No. 18                                      
                                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                        
                                                                   __________                                                                           
                                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                         
                                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                                           
                                                                   __________                                                                           
                                                    Ex parte FRIEDHELM STEFFEN                                                                          
                                                                   __________                                                                           
                                                           Appeal No. 99-0210                                                                           
                                                       Application 08/732,2851                                                                          
                                                                  ___________                                                                           
                                                                    ON BRIEF                                                                            
                                                                  ___________                                                                           

                 Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, MEISTER                                                                         
                 and ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                               
                 ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                   


                                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                           
                          This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner                                                                           
                 finally rejecting claims 13-33, which constitute all of the                                                                            
                 claims remaining of record in the application.                                                                                         






                          1    Application for patent filed October 28, 1996.                                                                           
                                                                           1                                                                            




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007