Ex parte FAILOR - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1999-0213                                       Page 3           
          Application No. 08/814,550                                                  


          (2) The compartments (trays) 6, 7, 8, 6', 7', 8' of Vaccaro are             
          not separate from the unitary body of the tool kit (carrier)                
          (brief, pp. 7 to 8).                                                        
          (3) Vaccaro does not disclose “at least one tray extending                  
          transversely across each of said front sections and said rear               
          section beneath the level of said center section,” as claimed,              
          because Vaccaro’s compartments are on the same level as the                 
          center section (brief, p. 8).                                               


               We do not agree with arguments (1) and (2).  It is                     
          fundamental that claims are to be given their broadest                      
          reasonable interpretation, and limitations are not to be read               
          into them from the specification.  In re Van Geuns, 988 F.2d                
          1181, 1184, 26 USPQ2d 1057, 1059 (Fed. Cir. 1993).  As for                  
          argument (1), the top surface of Vaccaro’s front section (with              
          compartments 6, 7, 8) slopes forwardly and downwardly from its              
          rear end to its front end, and the top surface of Vaccaro’s                 
          rear section (with compartments 6', 7', 8') slopes rearwardly               
          and downwardly from its front end to its rear end.  This is                 
          sufficient to meet the language of claim 1, since claim 1 does              
          not specify what part or how much of each of the front and rear             







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007