THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte RICHARD F. HONIGSBAUM
____________
Appeal No. 1999-0347
Application No. 08/804,6351
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before ABRAMS, STAAB, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 to 4 and 8 to 19, which are all of the
claims pending in this application.2
1Application for patent filed February 25, 1997.
2We note that claim 19 was not included in any rejection
set forth in the examiner's answer (Paper No. 13, mailed
August 14, 1998) and that claims 1, 4 and 17 were amended
subsequent to the final rejection (Paper No. 7, mailed
(continued...)
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007