Court Opinions

State Laws

US Code

US Constitution

Ex parte FRIEDHEIM - Page 1

Legal Research Home > Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 1999 > Ex parte FRIEDHEIM - Page 1

                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)              
          was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is                 
          not binding precedent of the Board.                                         
                                                            Paper No. 17              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                     __________                                       
                               Ex parte MAX FRIEDHEIM                                 
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 1999-0406                                  
                               Application 08/484,0191                                
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      

          Before ABRAMS, McQUADE and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent                  
          Judges.                                                                     
          McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               Max Friedheim appeals from the final rejection of claims               
          1 through 42, all of the claims pending in the application.                 
          We affirm-in-part and enter a new ground of rejection.                      
               The invention relates to a “generator for rapid                        


               1Application for patent filed June 7, 1995.                            
                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007