Ex parte BOCK et al. - Page 2




           Appeal No. 1999-0422                                               Page 2             
           Application No. 08/628,805                                                            


           indicated as allowable by the examiner (advisory action, Paper                        
           No. 12) and are not involved in this appeal.2                                         


                                          BACKGROUND                                             
                 The appellants' invention relates to a heat exchanger for                       
           cooling semi-conductor components comprising a base section                           
           and cooling fins attached to and projecting from the base                             
           section.  Each fin has a wavy profile in the region where it                          
           joins the base section.  An understanding of the invention can                        
           be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 9, which appears                         
           in the appendix to the appellants' brief.                                             
                 The prior art references of record relied upon by the                           
           examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                                        
           Hess                                    5,014,776                   May               
           14, 1991                                                                              
           Serizawa et al. (Serizawa)        5,542,176                    Aug.  6,               
           1996                                                                                  
                                                        (filed Jan. 30, 1995)                   
                 The following rejection is before us for review.                                



                 In the amendment filed August 25, 1997 (Paper No. 11), after the final2                                                                              
           rejection, claims 11-14 and allowable claim 17 were canceled and claim 20 was         
           substituted for canceled claim 17.  Additionally, claim 19 was amended to             
           depend from new claim 20.                                                             







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007