THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte MARK E. PALUSIS, CARLOS G. FIGUEROA,
DANIEL C. FRIEDBERG, GARY D. JONES and GUNTHER
EICHHORN
__________
Appeal No. 99-0650
Application 08/726,9781
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before ABRAMS, STAAB, and McQUADE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the rejection of claims
1-3, 7 and 8, which claims have been twice rejected by the
1Application for patent filed October 7, 1996. According
to appellants, the application is a division of Application
08/360,937, December 21, 1994, now U.S. Patent no. 5,592,814,
issued January 14, 1997.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007