Ex parte SCHREPF - Page 5




          Appeal No. 1999-0930                                                        
          Application 08/410,931                                                      



          the respective viewpoints of appellant and the examiner.  As a              
          consequence of our review, we make the determinations which                 
          follow.                                                                     


               We reverse the respective rejections of the claims on                  
          appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 103.                                               


               Initially, we make the following findings relative to the              
          examiner’s evidence of obviousness.                                         


               The Gueret document discloses an applicator device (Fig.               
          1) that includes a brush comprising a tuft of hairs 8 carried               
          by a stem 9 and a bottle 2 containing a liquid product L.  The              
          stem includes a hollow portion 14 defining a chamber or                     
          reservoir R which is capable of replenishment by capillarity                
          when the hairs 8 of the brush are immersed in the liquid                    
          product L.  The hollow portion 14 comprises capillary                       
          striations 18 (Fig. 2) oriented parallel to the axis of the                 

          been expected to draw from the disclosure.  See In re Preda,                
          401 F.2d 825, 826, 159 USPQ 342, 344 (CCPA 1968).                           

                                          5                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007