Ex parte GROBECKER et al. - Page 4




          Appeal No. 99-0952                                                          
          Application 08/795,494                                                      


          As a consequence of our review, we make the determinations                  
          which follow.                                                               


               We reverse the examiner’s rejection of claim 9 under                   
          35 U.S.C. 102(b). It follows that we likewise revere the                    


          rejection of claims 10 through 16 since, as earlier indicated,              
          these claims stand or fall with claim 9.                                    


               Claim 9 is drawn to a housing for storing disc-shaped                  
          information carriers comprising, inter alia, a support plate                
          (15)  which is flat on both sides and comprised in a central                
          portion of the housing so as to lie between lid parts when the              
          lid parts are closed, “said support plate extending                         
          asymmetrically between said lid parts (10, 11) so as to form                
          two spaces (17, 18) of different sizes between each side of                 
          the support plate and the facing lid part surface, each of                  
          said spaces extending over substantially an entire side of                  
          said support plate.”                                                        


               Akin to the understanding of the examiner, we appreciate               
                                          4                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007