Appeal No. 1999-1498
Application 08/547,604
Deneke shows a detent at bar 19, nor that a detent would
inherently be present there.
Accordingly, since Deneke does not disclose at least the
T-bar and detent as recited in claim 22, we will not sustain
the rejection of claim 22, nor of claims 28 and 29 dependent
therefrom.
Turning to rejection (2), the secondary reference, Good,
does not supply the deficiencies discussed above. Rejection
(2) therefore will not be sustained.
Conclusion
The examiner’s decision to reject claims 22, 24 and 28 to
31 is reversed.
REVERSED
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007