Ex parte BERRY - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1999-1740                                       Page 3           
          Application No. 08/799,433                                                  


                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               The appellant's invention relates to a flush glass seal                
          insert with a belt-line extension.  An understanding of the                 
          invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1,               
          which appears in the appendix to the appellant's brief.                     


               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Omura et al. (Omura)          4,908,989                Mar. 20,             
          1990                                                                        
          Norton                        5,694,718                Dec.  9,             
          1997                                                                        
                                                  (filed Sept. 6, 1996)               



               Claims 1 to 4, 6 to 8 and 10 to 14 stand rejected under                
          35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Omura.                           


               Claim 9 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                 
          unpatentable over Omura.                                                    


               Claim 5 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                 
          unpatentable over Omura in view of Norton.                                  








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007