THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DONALD S. RICH
____________
Appeal No. 1999-1751
Application No. 08/814,2991
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, NASE and
GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the refusal of the examiner to
allow claims 1 to 4 and 30, as amended subsequent to the final
rejection. Claims 24 to 29, the other claims pending in this
application, have been allowed.
1Application for patent filed March 10, 1997.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007