Court Opinions

State Laws

US Code

US Constitution

Ex parte HARUNA - Page 1

Legal Research Home > Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 1999 > Ex parte HARUNA - Page 1

                                                       Paper No. 22                   

               THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                           
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                  
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                    
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  

                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                        
                                   _______________                                    
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                   _______________                                    
                              Ex parte TSUTOMU HARUNA                                 
                                   and SADAO KITA                                     
                                   ______________                                     
                                Appeal No. 1999-2020                                  
                              Application D-29/058,0311                               
                                   _______________                                    
                              HEARD: DECEMBER 6, 1999                                 
                                   _______________                                    
          Before THOMAS, LALL, and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges.               
          THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        
                                                                                     


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                 
          rejection of the following design claim:                                    
                    The ornamental design for a pre-recorded optical                  

               1 Application for patent filed August 6, 1996.                         
                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 







Last modified: November  3, 2007