THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
This paper (1) was not written for publication and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Filed by: Trial Section Merits Panel
Box Interference
Washington, D.C. 20231
Tel: (703)308-9797
Fax: (703)305-0942
Paper 51
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
JAMES W. YOUNG, RAYMOND L. WOOSLEY and YIWANG CHEN,
Junior Party,
v.
RAYMOND L. WOOSLEY, JAMES W. YOUNG and YIWANG CHEN,
Junior Party,
v.
JAMES K. WOODWARD, RICHARD A. OKERHOLM,
MARK G. ELLER and BRUCE E. McNUTT,
Senior Party.
_______________
Patent Interference 103,875
_______________
Before: SCHAFER, LEE and TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judges.
JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO 37 CFR § 1.662(a)
Woosley has filed a notice under 37 CFR § 1.602(c) that by virtue of an assignment from
Sepracor, Inc, dated October 7, 1999, the Young application and Woolsey patent were assigned to
Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc., the real party in interest of the Woodward application. Notice Under 37
C.F.R. 1.602(c) (Paper 48). Thus, the involved patent and applications are commonly assigned. Counsel
for the common assignee has filed a request for adverse judgment under 37 CFR § 1.662(a) (Paper 49).
Upon consideration of the request for entry of adverse judgment against both junior parties, it is
Page: 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007