ISHIKAWA V. ULMER - Page 3




          Interference No. 104,214                                     Page 3           
          Ishikawa v. Ulmer                                                             
               FURTHER ORDERED that, based on the record before us,                     
          senior party Ulmer is entitled to a patent containing claims                  
          81-84 of its involved 08/877,606 patent application.                          




                             RICHARD E. SCHAFER                                         
                             Administrative Patent Judge                                


                                                                 BOARD OF               
                             JAMESON LEE                          PATENT                
                             Administrative Patent Judge       APPEALS AND              
                                                              INTERFERENCES             


                             RICHARD TORCZON                                            
                             Administrative Patent Judge                                























Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007