HAMILTON et al. V. LEE et al. - Page 2





               Upon consideration of the fact that the junior party has               
          failed to timely file a preliminary statement as required by                
          the MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER entered 15 December 1998, it               
          is                                                                          
                    ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 1, the              
          sole count in the interference, is awarded against junior                   
          party JOHN A. HAMILTON and PRUDENCE H. HARI.                                

                    FURTHER ORDERED that judgment on priority as to                   
          Count 1 is awarded in favor of senior party FRANK LEE, TAKASHI              
          YOKOTA, KEN-ICHI ARAI, TIMOTHY MOSMANN and DONNA RENNICK.                   

                    FURTHER ORDERED that, on the record before the Board              
          of Patent Appeals and Interferences, senior party FRANK LEE,                
          TAKASHI YOKOTA, KEN-ICHI ARAI, TIMOTHY MOSMANN and DONNA                    
          RENNICK is entitled to a patent containing claims 29, 31-34,                
          37-39 and 42 (corresponding to Count 1) of application                      
          08/466,543, filed 6 June 1995.                                              

                    FURTHER ORDERED that junior party JOHN A. HAMILTON                
          and PRUDENCE H. HARI is not entitled to a patent containing                 
          claims 1-6 (corresponding to Count 1) of U.S. Patent                        
          5,236,705,     granted August 17, 1993, based on application                
          07/720,868, filed 18 September 1991.                                        

                                        - 2 -                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007