Interference No. 104,031 Paper No. 23
Rutter v. Murray Page 3
the applicability of interference estoppel as explained
in Paper Nos. 2 and 22,
the terminal disclaimers proffered in Paper No. 20 at 5-6
in response to Paper No. 2, part C, and
the amendments proffered with Paper No. 20 in response to
Paper No. 2, part E.
RICHARD E. SCHAFER
Administrative Patent Judge
BOARD OF
JAMESON LEE PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge APPEALS AND
INTERFERENCES
RICHARD TORCZON
Administrative Patent Judge
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007