MORRISON et al. V. MANNHEIMER et al. - Page 3




          Interference No. 103,197                                                      


                    (b) Insufficient light to the tissue site ...... 50                 
                    (c) Motion artifacts due to needle movement .... 53                 
                    (d) Motion artifacts due                                            
          to fiber optic movement .................... 57                               
                    (e) Wavelength mismatch ........................ 58                 
                    (f) Insufficient tissue thickness .............. 59                 
                    (g) Failure to test over a                                          
          range of saturation values ................. 61                               
                    (h) Summary .................................... 63                 
               5.  Alleged additional problems                                          
          with the November 1987 designs .................. 64                          
               6.  The March 15, 1988, design                                           
          as proof of conception .......................... 65                          
               7.  Diligence ....................................... 70                 
               8.  Abandonment, suppression, or concealment ........ 80                 
          I.  Requests for reconsideration ......................... 81                 
          J.  Judgment ............................................. 81                 












                                        - ii -                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007